JVsearch said:
So you're just trying to say that the quality of the Fakais is in fact, pretty good and probably better then the actual MIK Tokais?
(I think this has been suggested on this forum in the past, and generally accepted)
And you're stating that they used better quality wood, as one of the main reasons the Fakais are better?
Given what I've picked up about the way things are done behind the scenes, I'd buy that if some hard evidence could be produced.
They really are better than the real Tokai MIK versions ... Many on this site clearly have stated this.They are better mainly due to the wood and the 1/4 sawn necks and the Canadian sunburst ones i have seen appear to have been book matched tops or atleast appear to be better matched than the genuine ones i have seen. I am not a Faki lover nor do i give a rats behind one way or the other if they are good or crap , as I have an Epi Les Paul , a Gibson and two Canadian Tokai's ...just my opinion having played Les Pauls for over 20yrs
Attached below you will find a link to the two i own up front , my other two are an Epi and a 2007 Gibby standard. I will take a few close up pictures and post them here of the two Canadian Tokais i own to illustrate what i have said - The wood (neck) is Canadian hard rock maple and 1/4 sawn !!! and the bodies are mahogony .. honestly just really nice guitars for the $$$.... my Zakk weighs in over 10lbs and my gold top comes in around 8lbs if i recall correctly. Everytime i take one or the other in for a restring job or adjustment whatever music store i take them to in Toronto all say ... yeh these were really nice when they were around for the cash then and still play really well...should have grabbed one at the time ..
http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/bb227/space_114/Blower/P1150262.jpg