SIGMA Σ Guitars

Tokai Forum

Help Support Tokai Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Sigmania

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
16,012
Reaction score
2,724
Location
NC, USA
It looks like Sigma Guitars have been made by many different manufacturers possibly from the beginning. And it is not clear to me when Tokai got involved with Sigma Guitars.

Tokai was heavily involved with Martin by 1972 when they began running Martin Japan.

The Sigma brand was established in Japan in 1970 as a way to source lower priced guitars to satisfy the market for lower priced guitars.

Sometime in the early 1990s Martin appears to have sold the Shenadoah brand and possibly the Sigma brand to Kurosawa who then contracted with Terada to build high spec torch in lay Martin clones labeled as Shenandoah and Sigma?

More recently the brand was sold again to an owner in Germany, Gunther Lutz who is having guitars made in China under the Sigma label.

SIGMA

I found this on line on the acoustic guitar forum:

Sigma Makers

"As mentioned above, 2007 was when Martin stopped using the name. They sold the rights to the name to AMI in Germany. They currently are the ones making SIGMA quitars in most of the world. However, Martin let the trademark lapse in the US before the sale. So there is a different Sigma here in the US and the SIGMA quitars are branded AMI if they are intended to sell here. However manv SIGMA quitars from AMT make it over here even though they were not "lintended" for the US market."






Timeline:

1970 Brand established in Japan
1972 Martin Japan formed and run by Tokai
1983 Some production moves to Korea?
199x Terada production of Sigma Guitars for Kurosawa
xxxx Production in Indonesia
2007 Martin sells brand to AMI in Germany
2007 Production ends in Indonesia
20xx Production resumes in China

Sigma Guitars Made In Japan

SIGMA Electric Guitars By..... ?

Sigma Guitars Made In Korea

Sigma Guitars Made In Indonesia

Sigma Guitars By Terada

Sigma Guitars Made In China
 
Last edited:
I wanted to also say a word about laminate guitars.

My understanding is a big reason many Japanese guitars were made with laminates, besides the cost, is how they respond to changes in atmospheric conditions.

Japan is on an island. Changes in humidity between indoors and out. Cold and warm.

Solid pieces crack or shrink more easily as a result of atmospheric conditions.

Just throwing that out there since I had heard that elsewhere.
 
Makes sense to me. I never was in the "it has to a solid top" brigade nor the "nitro" camp.
 
I assume you mean “solid top” re: Les Pauls? One of the best guitars I ever had was a 1981 LS120 with a veneer flame top. Amazing guitar.

With acoustics the top makes a big difference since the sound travels through it and out to the listener. All of the ones I posted have solid spruce tops. The back and sides filter tone and throw it back out. Veneer bodies can sound amazing.

There’s something I can’t put my finger on when the whole thing works.

I once had an early James Goodall guitar. I loved the tone of that guitar, but I was getting string buzz and the action was super low. I had it set up by a local luthier and when I got it back it wasn’t the same guitar. The mojo was gone and I sold it soon after. I don’t understand it.

For me, I know it when I hear it. How the guitar responds and resonates. I have described it as though it almost plays itself. But it’s fleeting, and maybe it’s my imagination.

I had it once with a 1930s Martin D18 I was looking at in a guitar shop. I still regret not finding a way to buy. And I have it with my LS100S.

Maybe it’s all just my imagination. 8)
 
I was referring to acoustic guitars. Woods are so variable and affected by local weather conditions too! I heard good and bad with both solids and laminates. You just have to go by sound and feel and if it suits you, grab it and run 8)
I did a setup on two acoustics for my ex Prof that I worked with until retirement in the middle of last year. The Tokai middle range model was laminate top, the other was a Martin D28 with a solid top and broken but repaired headstock (he bought it cheap in Canada because of that break) the Tokai was the better overall finished guitar and the neck and playability was way better, even after setup. I managed to get the Martin closer to the Tokai in setup, which is what he asked for. Slight difference in tone and the Prof prefered the Martin for tone and the Tokai for playability. The Martin neck wasn't as nice as the Tokai and its shape restricted the setup being closer to the Tokai. I liked both sounds but preferred the feel of the Tokai but I'm no acoustic player at all, so what do I know. Both guitars were from the mid 90's era.
 
Sigmania said:
Hmmm. So are you thinking Tokai made that Sigma Tele? Very similar. Super cool photos!

Well, it does seem likely, doesn't it? Never seen a Levin Sigma remotely like it anyway, they're always more ambitious attempts to copy the originals. I'm not sure for how long Tokai made guitars for CF Martin, but probably not far beyond 1975? The Levins are clearly later than that.

Here's another Sigma Tele, with the bridge cover off. That metal-covered pickup says 1972-73 or thereabouts, it's subcontractor-made parts of some sort (possibly Maxon or Gotoh?) seen in other brands of that time as well.

https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/sigma-sbf2-telecaster-style-martin-140603267

And here's an article about the original Sigma electrics, stating that production didn't go beyond 1974. No idea of how accurate it is, though.

http://www.amarshall.com/?s=sigma

The Tokai-badged Tele is interesting, looks like a solid-body with a Thinline pickguard. Never seen one with a Sigma logo, but I think Ampeg had them.
 
https://www.vintagejapanguitars.com.br/en/history-of-tokai/

Some history from Frankie's site
 
Not verified for accuracy



Sigma by Martin | Vintage Guitar® magazine

Sigma by Martin


Following the Line

Kevin Dunham

Long overlooked and relegated to an obscure corner of the collectible market, Sigma by Martin guitars have recently gained popularity among a new generation of collectors. If you’re one who has developed a taste for them (or other vintage Japanese brands), you likely know that Martin – as it readily admits – kept few notes regarding the Sigma line.

Thus, there is scant information on the brand – mostly anecdotes in far-flung strands of the internet; suppositional at least, unsubstantiated at best. In an attempt to remedy the situation, we offer this guide to the essential information on the enigmatic brand.

Gen I​

Seeking to compete in the market for budget-grade instruments, in 1970, Martin began importing acoustic guitars made by subcontractors in Japan. The instruments employed economy-minded materials like laminated woods for their tops, sides, and back, but were generally well-constructed. The initial batches had a zero fret, covered truss-rod access, and bridges with a saddle “elevator.” Roughly 20 models were offered; the classical instruments had slot pegheads, while the acoustic flat-tops were characterized by a flat headstock reminiscent of a chef’s spatula (and now nicknamed as such), with the logo consisting of a gold decal of the word “Sigma” surmounted by the corresponding Greek letter (∑) in mother of pearl.

Some very early DR-7 and DM-5 batches had what collectors call an interior “type zero” white label with a black border and the Gen I logo printed with “Produced and distributed by C.F. Martin & Co., Nazareth, Pennsylvania, USA.” The model designation was usually hand-written in ink along the bottom border.

By late ’72, the zero fret was being phased out and the saddle made non-adjustable, but still perched on a fixed bridge… except on the 12-string DR-12-7 – a fact that plagued Martin sales reps, who were advised to “convert” dealers to the DM-12-5.

Beginning in ’73, certain lower-end models were manufactured in Korea, setting a pattern of multi-country/multi-manufacturers that continued throughout the run.

Gen II​

By 1974, the initial Gen II instruments had arrived, and while they retained the spatula headstock and covered truss rod, they turned things up a notch by introducing solid tops.

Those tops were part of the upgrades on three models – the DT-22, DR-11, and DR-9 – which also sported a tapered headstock closer to the modern Martin; company documents referred to the design as the “type S” peghead. Other twists for Gen II included a line of five Tokai-made electric solidbody guitars, and the first non-guitar – the SB-5 banjo.

During this and later periods, Sigma actually made several types and models of acoustic and electric guitars, but they were mostly exported to Europe and distributed through Levin & Sons, a Martin-owned company based in Sweden.

In ’76, Gen II Sigmas made in Japan were introduced with the type S peghead, a new logo, different label, and other changes to synchronize with Martin’s domesitc models. In addition, several new solid-top guitars were rolled out, along with beginner and intermediate instruments. In a 1979 brochure, these were duly delineated as the 7, 5, and 3 series; models with higher numbers were given higher-quality materials and more-attentive craftsmanship, as well as overall quality and quantity of appointments.

In 1980, the line was expanded to include the SA-1 mandolin and SB-226 and SB-229 banjos. Also, the model numbering system used on guitars was rearranged to even more closely align with Martin designations (a move seen as good for marketing). Paper labels were phased out in favor of a pressure-incised oval on the back brace inside. Collectors call this the “football stamp,” and it reads “Sigma Guitars/Made in Japan For C.F. Martin & Co.” This continued for a few years, until the company began building in Korean, and returned to paper labels.

While it was long believed that the serial numbers of Sigma instruments were of little use in dating the instruments (except on the DR-28N and DR-35N, which were assembled and finished in Nazareth in 1981/’82 using Japanese-made parts and marked “Made in USA”), today there is a basic understanding of how they work, based in part on the many factories that produced Sigma instruments.

In 1983, the bulk of production was moved from Japan to South Korea, where the line underwent a huge expansion. Gen II solid-tops, however, were still made in Japan.

Each year, as new Korean-built models were introduced, some older models were retired or re-named. By ’84, Sigmas could be purchased with the Martin ThinLine 332 pickup and V.T.C. (volume and tone control), which required no installation and had a ¼” output jack. These were at first supplied by Barcus-Berry, then later by Fishman. In ’86 came the thin-bodied TB guitars with three-band EQ and transducer pickup. The electronics proved popular, and soon crossed over to become standard on many models (an electric/acoustic version became available in nearly every model category).

Gen III​

In 1988, the entire line was again re-named and re-categorized. New solid-top models were given SDM and SDR prefixes, and while it has long been speculated the S denoted “solid,” the ’88 catalog and spec sheets clearly indicate it meant “scalloped” – as in, hand-scalloped bracing. All Gen III solid-tops carried Martin’s warranty. Also introduced on some was the “age toned” top finish intended to better replicate a vintage guitar.

The Marquis Series (sometimes referred to as the 4 Series) guitars had scalloped-brace tops, cast tuning machines, and pearl inlays at the 12th fret. The line included the CS-4 classical, GCS-4 grand concert, dreadnought DM-4 and DM-4S (with sunburst finish), the mahogany-stained/spruce-topped DM-4M and DM-4Y (with “age toned” top), and the Venetian-cutaway DM-4CV.
Decades before other companies recognized their potential, Sigma unveiled two dreadnoughts that employed exotic woods – the distinctive Oriental Chestnut DT-4N and the DV-4, which had a spruce top and ovenkol body. Like their Marquis brethren, they carried a 10-year warranty.

The 2 Series, touted as the budget line, nonetheless included features mostly found on upper-end models – Grover tuning machines and “scalloped-style” top braces to go with their laminated top, back, and sides. Models were the mahogany CS-2 and rosewood CR-2 classicals, the mahogany grand concert GCS-2, the dreadnought mahogany DM-2, the rosewood dreadnought DR-1 and DR-2, and the mahogany 12-string DM-12-2.

Gen III mandolins were given a new designation system; the SM-1 was an A style, the SM-3 a two-point Florentine, and the top of the line SM-6 (sometimes called SM-10, SM-30, or SM-60) boasted a solid, carved top with a scroll and other high-end appointments. These were first-class Gibson knock-offs and are today highly valued by collectors. There were also three styles of banjos – the inexpensive SB-10, the midrange SB-25 (with a brass tone ring and a clear resonator), and the top of the line SB-80. It is thought that all mandolins and banjos were produced by Iida, in their Japanese and Korean facilities.
Circa 1993, Sigma introduced two Gibson-knock-off jazz guitars – the SEJ-35 and the SEJ-75. Beautiful and skillfully crafted (in Japan), they sold for $929 and $1,049 respectively and today are highly sought-after.

While advanced collectors continue to value Gen I and II Sigmas made in Japan as the highest-quality/most-desirable examples, for the sheer scope and ambitious breadth of the line at its height, Korean-made Gen III instruments are not far behind. So many makes and models were created, expanded, changed, retired, and re-named – it was the great flowering of the line.
In 1996, most production was moved to Taiwan and Indonesia, and almost all promotion and trade advertising ceased. Some new models were introduced – the DM-4B, DM-4L, solid tops CS-ST, DM and DR-1ST, and the FD-16M – while a core of established models remained, though one by one they faded from price lists, inventory manifests, and catalogs.

Sigma inspection and repair operation at the old Martin factory on North Street was curtailed and moved to the plant at 510 Sycamore Street, where it fizzled. By ’97, no more than five percent of Sigmas were being delivered to Martin for inspection while sales and marketing shifted to an in-house program known as Martin Telesales. The bulk of these instruments were shipped directly to dealers and end-users, bypassing Nazareth entirely.

The final Telesales catalog to feature Sigma instruments was published in late 2006. By the end of ’07, stock had been disposed, marking the end of a 37-year run for the line.

Kevin Dunham repairs and restores guitars, operates nossigmamartinguitars.com, and maintains a blog on Sigma guitars. He is compiling information for a book on the brand.

This article originally appeared in VG November 2015 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.
Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 8.14.04 AM.png
Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 8.14.16 AM.png
Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 8.14.29 AM.png
 
Last edited:
The ones with this label, Sigma Martin USA, are solid back & sides from my experience.

I had a couple of them years ago.

I believe they came designated as a DR35N or DR28N

Pieces cut in Japan, assembled in the US like a Shenandoah.

Sigma Martin USA DR-35N 1981 | Reverb

Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 9.11.45 AM.png
Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 9.12.14 AM.png
Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 9.12.08 AM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 9.11.28 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 9.11.28 AM.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
  • Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 9.11.37 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 9.11.37 AM.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
  • Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 9.11.49 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 9.11.49 AM.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 0
  • Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 9.11.57 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2023-02-06 at 9.11.57 AM.png
    752.9 KB · Views: 0
Shark fin? I was thinking someone was practicing doing wood binding. Very well done IMHO.
 
I am now thinking that when Martin sold off the Shenandoah brand to Kurosawa in the early 1990s that it also so off the Sigma brand?

Martin Shenandoah Acoustics

Speculative, but may explain all the over the top fancy Sigmas made by Terada (?) in the 90s (?)

That has always perplexed me.

And seems the Sigma brand was sold again more recently as they are being made in China these days it seems.
 
"In early 1970, the company became the third largest musical instrument manufacturer in city after Yamaha and Kawai Gakki. Tokai Gakki became the sole agent for C.F. Martin in Japan while Yamaha was Gibson’s. Tokai was Martin’s “Sigma” guitar builder as well as importer in those days."

Tokai Employee Toshihito (Toshi) Tsuchida
 
Back
Top