Post cancelled

[Bumblebee]

post cancelled

 

[marcusnieman]

Beauty but I'm leary of a possible headstock break / crack due to the black stinger paintjob on the back of the headstock - which was often used to conceal such a repair.

 

[JVsearch]

Beauty but I'm leary of a possible headstock break / crack due to the black stinger paintjob on the back of the headstock - which was often used to conceal such a repair.

The stinger looks genuine - here's another Heritage with a stinger:
http://www.lespaulforum.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1988801

 

[marcusnieman]

Beauty but I'm leary of a possible headstock break / crack due to the black stinger paintjob on the back of the headstock - which was often used to conceal such a repair.

The stinger looks genuine - here's another Heritage with a stinger:
http://www.lespaulforum.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1988801

Good point (pun intended). Maybe it's a Pavlovian response that everytime I see them, I think it's to cover something up (most are)

 

[plexirocker68]

It's a 150

140's have dot inlays

Heritage put stingers on them every now and again

It's very possible there is no break


Great guitars and much better than it's U.S.A. competition

Yes the tailpiece can be easily changed to the more common ones. abr and correct tailpiece
plexi

 

[Bumblebee]

Thanks for the infos.

There is for sure no head break!!!

 

[glaister3]

Good guitars!No problem changing bridge / tailpiece as per Gibson.
Headstock paint correct.