chrisheyes
Well-known member
This guitar definitely has the moustache shape on the Headstock Ochay !!
chrisheyes said:Paladin
I think it's earlier than 2003 as there is a posting dated 29th Jan 2002 which mentions the Retrspec truss rod cover.
Using the search facility on the forum on RETROSPEC and you will see posting by "Stokeboy" and "James" for them.
See below :
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2002 5:56 am Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just tried out an old Les Paul Reborn at Andy's in Denmark Street, London UK. Flame top, zebra pickups, Les Paul Reborn logo on the headstock, "RETROSPEC" (?) written on the truss-rod cover. Played and sounded fantastic, despite being quite beaten up and even when compared to a 5K Gibson reissue (honestly actually prefered it). So why didn't I buy it? An asking price of 1800 GBP (2500 USD) is why. I know they're rare but one went recently on ebay for about a third of that price. Still, if there are any rich Tokai-heads out there, go get it.....
Back to top
The recent relics are "LOVE ROCK models", this one says "LES PAUL reborn" .
Hence the confusion :-?
How old is old, when age is a state of mind ;-)
james said:When I was looking at it in Andy's they said it was brought in by the guy they were dealing with to get the new Tokais.
Stokeboy said:i will get pix once i can borrow my mate's camera! i don't even know the exact spec's but when i took the pup covers off earlier (a real pain it was too) it was 95% a solid flame top on top of what could also be a 1pc back. i bought it for ?760 after hagglin from ?800. the previous owner only had it for a month so i think ive got myself a great deal considerin they were goin for ?1200 new... however i have a feelin my new guitar will go up in value because there arent too many of these. i never even knew of a les paul reborn relic model. the guy at the store told me the story behind gibson letting tokai use the les paul name one more time. apparently they cud only do a certain number of these reborn models with les paul on the head or none at all an now i have one. if any of you guys saw it, youd think it was an original from the 80s. the craftsmanship is of of very high quality, the tuners, binding, pup covers (which are now off btw) were nicely aged aswell. everythin has been done great realism.. unlike some of fender custom shop's relics which ive seen in the past. the neck felt slighty slimmer to the 2002 gibson std i compared it to in the store. and did i say, this thing sounds amazing? i had only played this thought a peavy bandit and my blues jr in my uni room but i use a couple of half jcm stacks at home where my band is. i also forgot to mention, the trust rod are the gibson shaped with "RETROSPEC". i think i'll enjoy this one.
ian said:But one aspect still puzzles me ... it's one thing to take a current Love Rock & mess it up a bit, but I'm a bit uneasy about taking the same messed-up Love Rock & changing headstock decal to make it look like a guitar discontinued in 1979 ? maybe that's OK if it's well publicised & buyers know all about it ... but here it seems buyers had no idea what was being done (or maybe most of us missed the advertising) .
Ian.
chrisheyes said:Paladin
Where did you get your information about the relic's ?
Do you know where the guitars were made into Relic's, and by whom ?
chrisheyes said:Paladin
What I don't know is was mine an original Les Paul Reborn that has been relic'd to look like a '59 Unburst Les Paul.
chrisheyes said:Paladin
You may be correct with that theory, hence why I'm trying to ascertain
more details from Andy's guitar shop where it was potentially originally sold.
Tokai could have used old parts from stock in the factory to build the guitar as a prototype, just for market research. Would people pay big money for these definite "Lawsuit" guitars.
The plot thickens when you see a posting like this:-
james said:When I was looking at it in Andy's they said it was brought in by the guy they were dealing with to get the new Tokais.
And then there is this posting :-
Stokeboy said:i will get pix once i can borrow my mate's camera! i don't even know the exact spec's but when i took the pup covers off earlier (a real pain it was too) it was 95% a solid flame top on top of what could also be a 1pc back. i bought it for ?760 after hagglin from ?800. the previous owner only had it for a month so i think ive got myself a great deal considerin they were goin for ?1200 new... however i have a feelin my new guitar will go up in value because there arent too many of these. i never even knew of a les paul reborn relic model. the guy at the store told me the story behind gibson letting tokai use the les paul name one more time. apparently they cud only do a certain number of these reborn models with les paul on the head or none at all an now i have one. if any of you guys saw it, youd think it was an original from the 80s. the craftsmanship is of of very high quality, the tuners, binding, pup covers (which are now off btw) were nicely aged aswell. everythin has been done great realism.. unlike some of fender custom shop's relics which ive seen in the past. the neck felt slighty slimmer to the 2002 gibson std i compared it to in the store. and did i say, this thing sounds amazing? i had only played this thought a peavy bandit and my blues jr in my uni room but i use a couple of half jcm stacks at home where my band is. i also forgot to mention, the trust rod are the gibson shaped with "RETROSPEC". i think i'll enjoy this one.
I bought my guitar 10 miles away from Stoke. I could very well have the very same guitar now !
So, if this is a relic model built in 2002, how many were made with Les Paul Reborn on the headstock ?
hmmmmmm
Enter your email address to join: