Mystery Guitar Labels: Pearl

Tokai Forum

Help Support Tokai Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Homer J. Simpson

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2017
Messages
781
Reaction score
536
Location
Germoney
Among the hundreds of guitar labels used for guitars imported from Japan, "Pearl" is one of the more obscure and curious ones. Yes, "Pearl" the drum company was responsible for those guitars and basses, which were quite likely never hitting US soil through official channels, probably for a good reason I mention at the bottom of this write-up.

1. "Pearl" - The first chapter (1972-197?)

Asia guitar trade pioneer Jack Westheimer, initial owner of the "Teisco Del Rey" trademark and co-founder of Cor-Tek (later known as "Cort") also had a long-standing connection with the Pearl drum company. According to a write-up called (IIRC) "The Jack Westheimer Story" (that has now disappeared from Google search unfortunately), Pearl asked Westheimer to set up a guitar line for them. It could be speculated whether or not that connection also led to Pearl's purchase of the Hayashi factory for the acoustic guitar line, Hayashi had made acoustic guitars for Westheimer Sales before.

Besides export, the first "Pearl"-labeled electric guitars, basses and amps were seemingly also meant to be sold on the domestic market in the very early 1970s, as the only known brochures of 1972 and 1973 indicate, each showing 5 guitar and 4 bass models:

Pearl_Brochure_1972.jpg
Link to the brochure on Frankie Benedettini's vintagejapanguitars.com site

People usually guess that these guitars were made in the Matsumoku factory and who really made these guitars for them is stil subject to my occasional attempts at researching that and so far mere speculation. As always with these early thunders of the beginning copy war, little can be proven as a fact, for example whether or not they were made by Matsumoku.

Most of these instruments are very similar to those in most of the 1971-73 line-ups of other companies (if the catalogs were dated correctly), but there are weird little differences: For example, the LP copy headstock looks off in comparison, one volume knob is awkwardly close to the tailpiece, there is a characteristic pike on the neckplate. This guitar is identical to the first iteration of the Electra 2242 "Rock" model in their 1972 catalog, and also Chicago importer Strum&Drum's "Big Daddy" guitar. Note the headstock notches and the pickguard sitting on top of the pickup frames so they had to cut out little notches for the height adjustment screws:

Pearl_1972_InitialVersion_Rotated.jpg
Pearl PE-2162

Electra_2242_First_Version.jpg
Electra 2242 first version


Pearl_National_BigDaddy_LP_Neckplate_2.jpgPearl_National_BigDaddy_LP_Total_Rot.jpg
"Big Daddy" neck plate and guitar

The first versions of the 3 identical guitars have a zero fret neck and the fretboard inlays 19 and 21 are missing, by the way a deceivingly common feature of almost all entry-priced models across the catalogs of all the known brands in 1972, as if they all sourced their LP necks from the same source. But the Electra and the Pearl fretboards got the missing markers, the headstock notch was corrected and the zero fret disappeared in their next edition:

Pearl_LP_1972_Total.jpgPearl_LP_1972_Neckplate.jpgPearl_LP_1972_HSF.jpgPearl_LP_1972_Bridge.jpg
Updated Pearl PE-2162

I think it's safe to assume that the first Pearl and Electra... LPs copies came out of the same factory, and it looks very much like this factory is different from the factories that made the entry-level LP copies for Ibanez (Fujigen) and Aria (Matsumoku) in 1972. Confusingly, the companion "LP"-basses offered under the Pearl and National labels are - apart from the bridge - identical too, with the most prominent features being the bridge pickup being much closer to the neck and again the neck plate. The Electra on the other hand is clearly the Fujigen version of that bass (Gibson called it "Triumph" at that time), showing how quickly seemingly safe assumptions can turn into a red herring in this "who ordered what, where" guessing game. It's not unlikely that Pearl sourced this first line of guitars from multiple suppliers as well.

Pearl_LP_Bass_Total.jpg
Pearl_LP_Bass_Body.jpgPearl_LP_Bass_Body_Back.jpg

The Telecaster copy came with a zero fret as well and a Bigsby-style vibrato shifting the bridge PU to an unusal position, because it had to be fitted under the Tele-style pickguard.:

Pearl_1972_Tele_Bigsby_Total.jpgPearl_1972_Tele_Bigsby_BackTotal.jpg
Pearl_1972_Tele_Bigsby_HW.jpgPearl_1972_Tele_Bigsby_HS.jpg
Initial Telecaster model with multi-laminate neck and zero fret, tuners and pickups were obviously replaced

Its Telecaster bass companion (of course with the period-typical truss rod cover) appears to be pretty unique, at that time it may have been the first Telecaster bass copy with a second pickup, akin to the 1971 version of the original. But other than the original, the Pearl is a short-scale bass. Both of these copies show a cost-cutting feature usually associated with the worst of the Japanese exports - a plywood ("multi-laminate") neck. This makes them differ from the competitor brands and points again to a certain manufacturer, but not all of the first series of Telecaster basses and guitars have plywood necks, some (if not most) have regular 3-piece maple necks.

Pearl_1972_Tele_Bass_Total_rot.jpg
Pearl_1972_Tele_Bass__NeckPlate.jpgPearl_1972_Tele_Bass_HSF.jpgPearl_1972_Tele_Bass_HSBack.jpg
Pearl PB-3142 bass with plywood neck (and likely a pancake body)

Here's another PB-3142 with the paint stripped, showing the pancake body and a 3-piece neck:

Pearl_Tele_Bass_2_HSBack_Wood.jpgPearl_Tele_Bass_2_Neckplate_Body.jpg

The guitars shown in the brochure are the only ones seen in the wild so far, with the exception of the ES-175 copy that never shows up, and a Les Paul Recording copy that isn't in the brochure. Same neck as the regular LP Custom copy, version 2:

PEARL Les Paul Recording Copy.jpg

At the end, copies of that era have more in common than differences, they are guitars coarsely made to look like the originals, but internally different enough to make them their own class of guitars, which may or may not be an euphemism. What the Pearl guitars also have in common with all of their siblings are the early Maxon pickups and the laminate arched tops (hollow underneath) on the LP copies.

It seems like the amp series was introduced earlier than the guitars, because they all start out with the old, round shaped Pearl-logo that was used on the drums until maybe 1970. Pearl amps were much more ubiquitous than the guitars over here, and almost every rehearsal room I've been in had a Pearl or a Guyatone amp rotting away in a corner by the late 80s. The brochure lists only the 2 smaller amps known from Pearl, but the there was also a bigger "Sunflower 1200" guitar amp at that time, later renamed to "Duo Reverb". That's also the time when the "Vorg" label shows up for the first time in context with the amps.

Pearl_Sunflower_1200.jpgPearl_DuoReverb.jpgPearl_DuoReverb_Back.jpg
Pearl "Sun Flower" and "Duo Reverb" amps


For the acoustic guitars, Pearl simply bought Hayashi, a factory that Westheimer had tasked to make "Cortez" branded acoustics for him earlier. Unfortunately, http://catweb.tgtel.com is yet another source that has disappeared, it offered a complete looking set of catalogs for the acoustic guitar line, which is why I had the impression that the 1972/73 electric brochures are possibly the only brochures being made, and also that the guitars in it were not made for a long time.
 
Last edited:
So far I couldn't find many instruments that would plausibly or unambiguously fill the gap between this first series of instruments and the next one. The few exceptions are weird and seem to tell a story that has yet to be dug out: First off there are these 2 bolt-neck LP copies - the headstock logos lack the line under the letters and feature a typical Custom split diamond inlay. The missing line under the logo is what the Pearl acoustics have, so one might think these LPs were maybe made by Hayashi. But they have the typical Matsumoku neckplate, one with a serial number that only makes sense for 1981 or before 1975, when the serials didn't contain any manufacturing date information yet, the other one is (as per usual, likely) 1977 - if it's not a parts guitar anyway:

Pearl_LP_Odd_Gold_BoltOn.jpgPearl_LP_Odd_Gold_Neckplate.jpgPearl_LP_Odd_Gold_Headstock.jpg
The older looking one, the serial number and the missing fret markers 19/21 indicate an early production year. Unfortunately these are the only images.

Pearl_LP_1977_White_TotalFront_rot.jpg
Pearl_LP_1977_White_BodyBack.jpgPearl_LP_1977_White_HSF.jpgPearl_LP_1977_White_NeckPlate.jpg
"Matsumoku" checks out: Neck plate, control cavity shape and truss rod cover indicate a different era, the guitar may have suffered a refinish.

The other one is just as mysterious: If you check the grainy catalog scan closely, the guitars carried a cool little "P" ornament on the pickguards. This has not been seen on any live imported instruments yet, so one could think that they maybe did that on the domestic market only, or not at all. A few of the first series Pearl guitars showed up on Japanese auction and collector sites and didn't have that feature either, but I found this very strange SG - it too looks like it was made much later than the first series guitars (this one popped up in Australia):

Pearl_SG_P-PG_Total2.jpg
Pearl_SG_P-PG_Hardware.jpgPearl_SG_P-PG_HSF.jpgPearl_SG_P-PG_Neckplate.jpg


2. Pearl Guitars, Act II: "Vorg by Pearl" (1977 - 1980/81)

What I can say for sure is that production of the typically crude first series instruments ended at the latest with the introduction of the "Vorg by Pearl" series in 1977. "Vorg by Pearl" is often seen as the "budget" brand of Pearl but there's not much evidence that this was actually a parallel product line. Instead it looks much more like this was a complete reboot with a redesigned product line-up, made in a new factory. However, it looks like there were only two rather short bursts of production.

vorgcatalog.jpg
Part of a"Vorg" inlay in a 1977 issue of a British guitar magazine, IIRC posted by an Irish chap in an extinct forum many moons ago

"Vorg by Pearl" was unambiguously made by Matsumoku and brought a wider range of products with much better copies compared to the first series, similar to the offerings of other brands at that time. There are proper Strats (big headstock, proper F-style nuts, no TRC), Tele and Tele Deluxe, Jazz and Precision bass copies.

VbP_F-Style_Collage.jpg
A very incomplete selection of "Vorg by Pearl" F-style planks


Except for some set-neck LP models, all instruments have serial numbers following the new Matsumoku numbering schemes indicating the year, many neck plates actually have "Matsumoku" engraved into them.

VbP_NeckPlate_Serials.jpg


VbP_Tele_TL_Deluxe_N_Body_ReplacementBridge.jpgVbP_Tele_TL_Deluxe_N_HS.jpgVbP_Tele_TL_Deluxe_N_Pancake_NeckPlate.jpg
Thinline Deluxe Telecaster, as per usual with Maxon pickups, nice maple neck with bullet trussrod, pancake body construction

3 set-neck LPs models offer open book headstocks, split-diamond inlay for the Custom models, authentic Grover and Kluson tuner copies and at least later (1980) Custom models have PCBs in the electronics cavity, just like the Aria Pro-II and numerous other Matsumoku-made budget LPs of the time. Some of them may also share the hollow, laminated tops with them, but maybe not all.

VbP_LP_Deluxe_Total.jpg
VbP_LP_Deluxe_N-PU_Cavity.jpgVbP_LP_Deluxe_1980_Headstock.jpgVbP_LP_Deluxe_1980_Serial.jpg
Vorg by Pearl LP Deluxe copy with 1980 serial, mini-humbucker mounting bracket in neck PU cavity

Pearl_Vorg_LP_MIJ_Sticker.jpgVbP_LPC_Control_PCB.jpg
Standard headstock without serial (just a MIJ sticker), Custom model with PCB controls

Not that price is telling much about quality, but the prices for the Vorg Pearls were reflecting their projected target audience. Below is a small ad in a 1978 issue of the German "Fachblatt Musikmagazin" - an LP copy could be had for 480 Deutschmarks, a Strat copy for 500 (no idea how that could end up more expensive). For comparison, a decent Aria Pro II (LS-600) single-cut was around 1,000DM, a set-neck Aztec (Maya) LP copy was 850DM. The Dollar was around 2.00 DM back then, so you need to divde the price by 2 to get the prices in $. On the other hand, a Fender Strat was around $570 (SRP) w/o case back then in the US, in Germany they where sold between 1,000 and 1,500DM at that time.

Vorg_Preise.jpg

In the same year new "Vorg Series" amps were released - 6 combo amps, 2 heads, half of them with built-in Phaser (a must in 1977!) and a "VB-101A" bass head with matching cabinet. In the effects department, Pearl had tape delays like the "Echo Pack" (with cardridges) and the "Echo Orbit" (similar to Roland's Space Station) before, those were labeled "Vorg" now and a number of Vorg stomp boxes were added (F-501...F-504). The Flanger is particularly funny, can you find the typo?

Vorg_Flanger_Effct.jpgVorg_Echo_Orbit-1_EO-301.jpg
Vorg F-504 flanger, Echo Orbit-1 tape delay machine

If production was continuous from 1977 through 1980/81 is questionable - all Vorg by Pearl guitar and basses I could see so far have either 1977 or 1980/81 serial numbers. The stragglers in the series seem to be the Rickenbacker 4001 copies, seen in "GreenGlo" and "FireGlo", one of the examples below was made in 1981:

VbP_GreenGlo_Collage.jpg
Left: 1980 serial, right: 1981

These late Matsumoku-made guitars are somewhat odd because production had obviously shifted to Taiwan a year earlier, as the next part will show:
 
Last edited:
3a. Crazy 80s Part 1: The mystery "Pearl" Les Paul Custom copies

These LP models are the reason why I started research on Pearl guitars around 2017: I remember them popping up in German stores in the early 80s, and I even had one of those as a long-term loaner. There were 2 versions of this set-neck LP copy: Both guitars weighed a ton (10+ lbs) because - unlike the "Vorg by Pearl" singlecuts - they had massive (nyatoh? mahogany?) pancake bodies and bound maple necks with fret nibs (!), open book headstock and the 70s volute in common. The simpler model came with the typical budget guitar tuners and without headstock ornament or back binding, the better one had Schaller-style tuners, a "Fleur de lis" inlay on the headstock and a bound back. I had the latter version and found it a pretty decent guitar back then, so I got curious what the the deal was with those.

These guitars are often sold with the "MIJ" attribute but to my surprise it turned out that they were actually made in Taiwan. Not all of them have a serial number but some do and since the 7-digit numbering scheme checks out with the years they appeared, I assume that they were made only in 1980-81.

Pearl_Taiwan_Front.jpgPearl_Taiwan_Back.jpgPearl_SetNeck_MIT_Sticker.jpg
The cheaper version of the guitar and an example that still had the "Made in Taiwan" sticker

80s Pearl Single Cutaway Electric Guitar Set Neck_Total.jpg
80s Pearl Single Cutaway Electric Guitar Set Neck_Back.jpg
80s Pearl Single Cutaway Electric Guitar Set Neck_HSF_FDL.jpg80s Pearl Single Cutaway Electric Guitar Set Neck_FEB.jpg
The more expensive version in black (colors were BB, Wine Red, Cherry- and Brown Sunburst)

Pearl_FDL_TSB_Serial_1981.jpgPearl_FDL_Red_Serial.jpgPearl Les Paul Custom 1973 Black beauty Reverb Australia_Serial.jpg
Several examples with 1980 and '81 serial numbers

Having identified them as Taiwan-made, I noticed a common detail: Please note the "TBK" stickers on the pots, they will become important again soon:

Pearl_FDL_Control_Cavity_TBK.jpg

The "Cortez" Tangent

"Cortez" is one of the numerous brands Westheimer used for his business. Michael Wright wrote in "Guitar Magazine" that "Cortez guitars were always made in Japan, never in Korea". To my knowledge, only the "never in Korea" part is true because the very same Taiwanese LP copy models were made with the "Cortez" label and an appropriate headstock for the US-market. This appears quite odd given that Westheimer had established Cor-tek in Korea almost a decade earlier. Less odd for Pearl though, they had set up drum production in Taichung, Taiwan in 1973. Maybe Jack just found them nice.

Pearl_Cortez_1_FDL.jpgPearl_Cortez_2_Headstock_NoFDL.jpgPearl_Cortez_2_Serial.jpgCortez_OB-Headstock-ControlCavity_ChinaPots.jpg
"Cortez" with Fleur-de-lis inlay, one plain and the back of that headstock with 1980 serial number and retrofitted Grovers, control cavity with "TBK" stickers


3b. Crazy 80s Part 2: A long-term source of confusion - the "other" Pearl guitars

There are numerous generic Strats, Teles, P- and J-basses (and a set-neck SG) floating around with the regular "Pearl" logo, all with more accurate and modern appointments, hence clearly made post-1975 (one indicator is always the position of the "thud bar" on F-style basses, which Fender changed to become a "thumb rest" in 1974, and this change does not reflect on Japanese copies until 1976).

Pearl_PB_Black.jpgPearl_PB_Sunburst.jpg
Pearl_Tele_Back.pngPearl_Tele_Front.pngPearl_Tele_N_NoSer_Total.jpgPearl_SG_Std_SetNeck_F.jpg
Pearl_SG_Std_SetNeck_HSR_Serial.jpgPearl_SG_Std_SetNeck_R.jpg

They are also of generally pretty solid quality and featured 2- or 3-piece bodys instead of "pancake" and solid 1 or 2-piece necks without glue seams on F-style headstocks etc., which may be the reason why the somewhat more era-typical "Vorg by Pearl" series is considered the "budget" line of guitars.

But something didn't check out with those Pearls - they were all looking "too good", they all don't have a serial number and most importantly they always have blank neck plates, which is absolutely not Matsumoku-style and - while not unhead of- rather unusual for Japanese guitars of the assumed era in general .

The first hint came from this image, showing a "Pearl" labeled pre-CBS headstock. This would be quite unusual for MIJ Strat copies made before, let's say, 1977 (AFAIK only Fernandes did that in 1975):

Pearl_PreCBS_HS.jpg

Then somebody finally posted pictures of the untouched innards of a 70s-CBS-headstock Strat:

Pearl_Strat_TBK_Total.jpgPearl_Strat_TBK_Headstock_Back.jpg
Pearl_Strat_TBK_Electronics.jpg

Blank neck plates, the same "TBK" stickers on the pots - looks like the "mystery LP" guitars above and the "too good looking" Fender copies are likely parts of the same series, possibly all made in Taiwan, not Japan. That is not to say that there can't be any MIJ, but in the past 6 years no "Pearl" labeled guitar with modern features and a non-blank neckplate, or at least a "Made in Japan"-sticker has caught my eye so far. After dwelling so much in speculation-land, let's head back to guitars that are known to be made in Taiwan...
 
Last edited:
4. Still the crazy 80s: The fat lady sings -"The Pearl Guitar Company" Export Series (1980-82)


Also in busy 1980, the "Export" series guitars debuted under the name "The Pearl Guitar Company" and the name and the logo were a cheeky (and funny) provocation: In the same year (!), Gibson released the new "Sonex" series bolt-on neck budget guitars coated in a synthetic material called "resonwood", and put a new "The Gibson Guitar Company" logo onto the headstocks:

TPGC_Logo.jpgTGGC_Logo.jpg

That's where the similarities end though: The Pearl "Export" series guitars are made out of wood and have a different design. There is a set-neck single-cut called "Custom" with an undecorated body but a bound neck with fret nibs and the era-typical brass parts:

Pearl_Export_Custom_Total_rot.jpg
Pearl_Export_Custom_HSBack.jpgPearl_Export_Custom_Fretboard.jpg
Pearl Export Custom, 1980

A simple bolt-on "Standard" version with cheaper tuners covers the lower range of allowances and a double-cut guitar and bass, with some appointments of the "Custom" above but with the looks of Epiphone's 1979 "Genesis" experiment, are the "Deluxe" models of the series:

Pearl_Export_Deluxe_Total.jpgPearl_Export_Deluxe_N_Total.jpg
Pearl Export Deluxe


pearl_export_genesis_bass MIT.JPGPearl_Export_Genesis_Bass_CoolSerial.jpgpearl_export_les_paul_deluxe (33).JPG
Serial numbers on various "Export" guitars/basses, 1982 (w/ MIT-sticker),1981 (cool number!) and 1982 again.

Serial numbers seem to indicate 1980-82 and I remember them showing up in magazine ads around that time, the Taiwanese serial number scheme might actually indicate the build year. Later I learned that (according to Wikipedia) the Epiphone Genesis guitars were made in Pearl's Taiwanese factory as well.

Epiphone Genesis guitars.jpg]
Epiphone Genesis guitars

In the accessories department, the new "Spice Rack" effects board and Pearl stomp boxes kept showing up until the mid-80s in magazines, but 1982 seems to be the last year Pearl made guitars under their name.

Pearl_Spice_Rack.jpgemm_83_03-111.jpgPearl_Stompboxes_Ad_1985.jpg
Pearl "Spice Rack" pedal board,
Pearl stompbox ads 1982 and 1985

This concludes the short and occasionally surprising history of "Pearl" guitars. They were sold only in parts of the world, they likely never sold in big numbers and so it's not surprising that they are relatively unknown. Even Pearl, when asked by a curious owner several years ago, was surprised to hear that they sold guitars!

The "Norlin" twist

Apart from the fact that there was a) no "lawsuit" in 1977 and b) this "lawsuit" that never happened was only between Norlin and Elger Co./Hoshino USA...in the USA, meaningless for the rest of the world for many more years to come - the Norlin Corporation was the distributor of Pearl in the US and their UK subsidiary (Norlin Music) in the UK. They likely didn't distribute the guitars in the US but they did in the UK in 1978, quite likely also in 1977. I couldn't find out when exactly Dallas-Arbiter went bankrupt and Norlin Music took over the Pearl distribution from them, or when exactly this ended (must have been before 1983) but it is obvious that Norlin distributed copies of their own (OK) and competitor (oops!) designs at the very same time they threatened Elger/Hoshino USA with legal actions for doing so.

Summary:

- The oldest "Pearl" electrics were made 1972, with a very limited range of models, likely neither made by Matsumoku nor by Fujigen, and targeting the lowest shelves in the shops. How long these were actually produced cannot be deducted so far and it looks only one model was added to the line-up, even though variations have popped up. Production seems to have shifted to Matsumoku at some point in (or shortly before) 1977, the neck plates help telling them apart.

- A second (and possibly third) batch of low- to lower-mid-price instruments called "Vorg by Pearl" came out of the Matsumoku factory in 1977 and 1981/82, and so far there were no indications that any of those were made in the years in between.

- Between 1980 and 1982 a wash of "Pearl" labeled, somewhat higher quality copies came out of Pearl's Taiwanese factory, so did the "Pearl Export" series instruments at the same time, while a few "Vorg by Pearl" models were apparently also still made by Matsumoku until 1981. Likely no electric guitars were made after 1982, , Pearl dug a little into the microphone and electronics business (e.g. a "programmable" 12-channel mixer 1983) in the first half of the 80s, stomp boxes were sold until 1985, then Pearl retired their non-drum branches completely.
 
Last edited:
Disclaimer: This is my current state of knowledge, or should I say guesswork, after 6 years of repeatedly nerding out on this topic. It started because I was curious and it continued because I had so many "this can't be right" moments reading the various claims and theories about the origin of these guitars.

If I learned something useful on the way then it's that very little information in this "weird export labels"-realm can be considered actual facts. Most of the knowledge gained in it is generally half hearsay- and half speculation-based "Sherlock Holmes"-like deduction techniques, if anything. Sometimes things that seem obvious and "fact-like" can look very different years later, when more bits got added to all the the jigsaw puzzling. Therefore, I have to take my own research with a whole spoon of salt and so should you, generally, when it comes to strange old Japanese guitars.


Edit3: This post is a placeholder for later additions.
 
Last edited:
Wow.... That's a lot of work! Good job!

I once had an Ibanez Tele with the same TRC.

And I believe I remember that some of the early Ibanez LP clones had hollow spaces in the top.

My tele was like this one.

Mod. 2352 [Item #3836] 1975 c.

Ibanez-Model-3843-Telecaster-Copy-1975-008.JPG
Ibanez-Model-3843-Telecaster-Copy-1975-001.JPG
 
Phew, finally done with that so far, glad it's out. The guitars were incredibly similar in the early 70s, particularly F-style guitars are really hard to tell apart if it's not an Aria or Ibanez. Same trussrod covers, they all were starting out with LP-style toggle switches and the same hardware supplier... but if the same old Fujigen-plank has Ibanez on the headstock, it's worth twice as much. Crazy. :)
 
Very rare proof that the PE-6062 ES-175 copy actually existed (first time I see images of one popping up on eBay). Not sure about the tuners and the headstock missing an inlay, but the pickguard has the "P" like in the brochure:

Screenshot 2023-05-15 at 16.09.08.jpgScreenshot 2023-05-15 at 16.09.20.jpgScreenshot 2023-05-15 at 16.09.33.jpgScreenshot 2023-05-15 at 16.09.50.jpg
 
"First series" domestic LP copy in sunburst, with the "P" pickguard and TRC. Very different from the PE-2162 in the brochure and what I called the "updated" version with no zero-fret. Note the circular control cavity cover and no (!) switch cover (what the...how? Never seen anything like that!):

imgcdn.jpgimgcdn2.jpgimgcdn3.jpgimgcdn4.jpgimgcdn5.jpgimgcdn6.jpg
 
Last edited:
3a. Crazy 80s Part 1: The mystery "Pearl" Les Paul Custom copies

These LP models are the reason why I started research on Pearl guitars around 2017: I remember them popping up in German stores in the early 80s, and I even had one of those as a long-term loaner. There were 2 versions of this set-neck LP copy: Both guitars weighed a ton (10+ lbs) because - unlike the "Vorg by Pearl" singlecuts - they had massive (nyatoh? mahogany?) pancake bodies and bound maple necks with fret nibs (!), open book headstock and the 70s volute in common. The simpler model came with the typical budget guitar tuners and without headstock ornament or back binding, the better one had Schaller-style tuners, a "Fleur de lis" inlay on the headstock and a bound back. I had the latter version and found it a pretty decent guitar back then, so I got curious what the the deal was with those.

These guitars are often sold with the "MIJ" attribute but to my surprise it turned out that they were actually made in Taiwan. Not all of them have a serial number but some do and since the 7-digit numbering scheme checks out with the years they appeared, I assume that they were made only in 1980-81.

View attachment 11919View attachment 11918View attachment 11917
The cheaper version of the guitar and an example that still had the "Made in Taiwan" sticker

View attachment 11923
View attachment 11920
View attachment 11922View attachment 11921
The more expensive version in black (colors were BB, Wine Red, Cherry- and Brown Sunburst)

View attachment 11927View attachment 11926View attachment 11924
Several examples with 1980 and '81 serial numbers

Having identified them as Taiwan-made, I noticed a common detail: Please note the "TBK" stickers on the pots, they will become important again soon:

View attachment 11925

The "Cortez" Tangent

"Cortez" is one of the numerous brands Westheimer used for his business. Michael Wright wrote in "Guitar Magazine" that "Cortez guitars were always made in Japan, never in Korea". To my knowledge, only the "never in Korea" part is true because the very same Taiwanese LP copy models were made with the "Cortez" label and an appropriate headstock for the US-market. This appears quite odd given that Westheimer had established Cor-tek in Korea almost a decade earlier. Less odd for Pearl though, they had set up drum production in Taichung, Taiwan in 1973. Maybe Jack just found them nice.

View attachment 11928View attachment 11930View attachment 11931View attachment 11932
"Cortez" with Fleur-de-lis inlay, one plain and the back of that headstock with 1980 serial number and retrofitted Grovers, control cavity with "TBK" stickers


3b. Crazy 80s Part 2: A long-term source of confusion - the "other" Pearl guitars

There are numerous generic Strats, Teles, P- and J-basses (and a set-neck SG) floating around with the regular "Pearl" logo, all with more accurate and modern appointments, hence clearly made post-1975 (one indicator is always the position of the "thud bar" on F-style basses, which Fender changed to become a "thumb rest" in 1974, and this change does not reflect on Japanese copies until 1976).

View attachment 11935View attachment 11937
View attachment 11938View attachment 11939View attachment 11940View attachment 11941
View attachment 11942View attachment 11943

They are also of generally pretty solid quality and featured 2- or 3-piece bodys instead of "pancake" and solid 1 or 2-piece necks without glue seams on F-style headstocks etc., which may be the reason why the somewhat more era-typical "Vorg by Pearl" series is considered the "budget" line of guitars.

But something didn't check out with those Pearls - they were all looking "too good", they all don't have a serial number and most importantly they always have blank neck plates, which is absolutely not Matsumoku-style and - while not unhead of- rather unusual for Japanese guitars of the assumed era in general .

The first hint came from this image, showing a "Pearl" labeled pre-CBS headstock. This would be quite unusual for MIJ Strat copies made before, let's say, 1977 (AFAIK only Fernandes did that in 1975):

View attachment 11944

Then somebody finally posted pictures of the untouched innards of a 70s-CBS-headstock Strat:

View attachment 11947View attachment 11946
View attachment 11945

Blank neck plates, the same "TBK" stickers on the pots - looks like the "mystery LP" guitars above and the "too good looking" Fender copies are likely parts of the same series, possibly all made in Taiwan, not Japan. That is not to say that there can't be any MIJ, but in the past 6 years no "Pearl" labeled guitar with modern features and a non-blank neckplate, or at least a "Made in Japan"-sticker has caught my eye so far. After dwelling so much in speculation-land, let's head back to guitars that are known to be made in Taiwan...
Hi Col from South Australia here,
I have a Pearl Cherry Red Les Paul copy from probably 1982 ish ? Has no neck back plate, no serial numbers, Lovely action, straight neck and lovely to play. Had it since new. Weighs a ton but over the years i have not seen one like it on the net. Just adding to the puzzle ? Does anybody want more info or picks ? Rgds
 
Yes on pics.
Hi, I'll get some pics together over the next few days and post them. The build is great / awesome.
Put a treble Pat Paf ? original Les Paul pickup on it. Great stuff but grungy original mid/ bass which has it's place. Always wondered about this Guitar so any help / advice / knowledge would be great.
Rgds Col
 
Howdy,

When having a closer look while taking pics i did find the serial number - ( 0510436 ).
Interesting note but surely an incorrect pic label on the 1973 Black Beauty pic ( From this Thread ).
Wave your mouse over the Black Beauty Pic on this thread.
The serial number is 14 digits difference so I presume the " Black Beauty is a 1980's guitar ?
My Pearl Les Paul Copy has had Volume and tone knob changes along with bridge and tuning heads.
So to agree with Homer J, yes. Bought it in 1983 in Adelaide and jammed with it a lot. Yes showing some well worn scars ! Hope this helps a bit re these Guitars.

Thinking of stripping it back to bare maple / mahogany, put some great pickups on it etc Yada Yada,

Let Me know if you have any thoughts Guys / Gals ?
 

Attachments

  • 1973 Custom Pearl black beauty reverb  Australia.jpg
    1973 Custom Pearl black beauty reverb Australia.jpg
    16.3 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_20230601_132626.jpg
    IMG_20230601_132626.jpg
    54.3 KB · Views: 1
  • IMG_20230601_134631.jpg
    IMG_20230601_134631.jpg
    81.7 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_20230601_132519.jpg
    IMG_20230601_132519.jpg
    82.2 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_20230601_132604.jpg
    IMG_20230601_132604.jpg
    86.8 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_20230601_134640.jpg
    IMG_20230601_134640.jpg
    188.6 KB · Views: 1
  • IMG_20230601_134653.jpg
    IMG_20230601_134653.jpg
    188.6 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_20230601_134725.jpg
    IMG_20230601_134725.jpg
    67.4 KB · Views: 2
Great pics.

And I wouldn’t strip it personally.

Once you strip or alter a vintage instrument that much you destroy most of its historical value as well as the serial number.

The nicks and bumps tell a story to those able to read it.

I would preserve it as is.
 
Interesting note but surely an incorrect pic label on the 1973 Black Beauty pic ( From this Thread ).
Wave your mouse over the Black Beauty Pic on this thread.
That's the image label from the original Reverb listing turned into the file name of the image - one of the reasons why I made this thread is that these guitars are more often than not mislabeled with made up build years. :) So your example was likely made in 1980 too.

I'd advise against stripping the paint too, for the simple reason that there's a not so small chance you may not like what you find underneath the paint, and the work involved to find that out.
 
You can stain and fill those chips with super glue as I assume this is a poly finish.

You can get different viscosities of glue through Stew Mac
 
That's the image label from the original Reverb listing turned into the file name of the image - one of the reasons why I made this thread is that these guitars are more often than not mislabeled with made up build years. :) So your example was likely made in 1980 too.

I'd advise against stripping the paint too, for the simple reason that there's a not so small chance you may not like what you find underneath the paint, and the work involved to find that out.
I'm hearing you ! Potentially the lovely timber underneath but yeah the potential bog / filler that's been added at the factory. Plus the potential amazing amount of messy work. Although have been there done that on vintage furniture.
This doesn't equate to a strip down option but what do you think guitar value might be ?
Although don't need the money or want to sell it.
I'm thinking approx maybe $250 USD ???
For insurance reasons ? or the fact i just keep destroying strings with it knowing it's an awesome guitar with some great history and value. And thank you for shedding some light on it's beginnings.
I do have a song ( Nice ) using this guitar in the early days. If you want a copy from 8 track recording for the hell of it let me know otherwise thank you for the post and interest on Pearl Guitars. Rgds Col
 
That question is very hard to answer. Short version: Ask yourself for what kind of money you would buy it or let it go (personal value), then check what people ask for them on Reverb.com, CL, eBay, Gumtree and so on, then find the middle ground. This is a moving target of course, with local differences on top. For insurance it's probably more important what it would cost you to replace it (I guess).

Long version: Prices are generally grossly inflated based on misinformation, wishful thinking and guesswork. This is particularly true for all the export, budget copies. Here's an example:

https://reverb.com/item/68870439-pearl-les-paul-custom-1976-80-setneck-japan-vintage
That's exactly your guitar, admittedly in (superficially) good condition. But still, it's the somewhat cheaper version w/o the headstock inlay and potentially unknown differences underneath the finish. The asking price is a bit over $1,000 (990€). Before the pandemic they were going for half of that. What I find personally wrong with that would go beyond the scope of this thread though and should probably go into a new one.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top