Burny rlc 70 rr fretboard radius

Tokai Forum

Help Support Tokai Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

wewazkangz

New member
Joined
May 17, 2024
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Hello everyone.

I decided to refret my Randy Rhoads model. I assumed it had a 12" radius however it seems to be closer to 7.25"!

Does anybody know if this is common for Burny Les Pauls or is this guitar some oddball?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240517_152425_1.jpg
    IMG_20240517_152425_1.jpg
    138.1 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_20240517_152406.jpg
    IMG_20240517_152406.jpg
    145.7 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_20240517_152430.jpg
    IMG_20240517_152430.jpg
    136.5 KB · Views: 0
Really hard to tell what's going on from the pictures. Looks like it's just a smaller radius near the edges? I don't have a radius gauge to double-check but my RLC-60 is definitely not 7 ¼".
 
Screenshot 2024-05-20 at 23.52.07.jpg

Well look at that...in the 1989 catalog! 250R, that's 9.8". The 1990s RLCs are listed with "280R", that would be 11". So for some reason the LC-70RR is supposed to have a smaller radius, identifying that as an LC70RR and not just a white RLC-60/70.
 
Of all the Burny Les Paul style guitars I’ve had the custom models feel like they have a noticeably flatter radius than the standard or burst models. That would include several customs I’ve had dating from the late 70s into the mid 1990s. I had one Randy Rhodes model pass through my collection, and one of the reasons that I didn’t bond with it was the neck thickness/roundness as well as the flatter fretboard.

While I think you can trust your eyes and instruments with the data you see and observe in the catalogs, my impression and experience are that this model would tend to be flatter than other Burny models in the relative sense. The one asterisk or exception to me would be that Burny models patterned on the 57 black beauty do have more rounded profile than my other customs. I’d think that the flatter profile might well come from the fact that the RR was well patterned on Rhodes actual 1970s Les Paul Custom.

I may not be alone in this view, but I’m confident that one of the reasons that these Burny and Fernandes artist or endorser models are so accurate would have been because so many of these musicians traveled to and performed in Japan throughout the 70s and 80s, and technicians would have had first-hand access to the originals to gather specs.
 
Of all the Burny Les Paul style guitars I’ve had the custom models feel like they have a noticeably flatter radius than the standard or burst models. That would include several customs I’ve had dating from the late 70s into the mid 1990s. I had one Randy Rhodes model pass through my collection, and one of the reasons that I didn’t bond with it was the neck thickness/roundness as well as the flatter fretboard.

While I think you can trust your eyes and instruments with the data you see and observe in the catalogs, my impression and experience are that this model would tend to be flatter than other Burny models in the relative sense. The one asterisk or exception to me would be that Burny models patterned on the 57 black beauty do have more rounded profile than my other customs. I’d think that the flatter profile might well come from the fact that the RR was well patterned on Rhodes actual 1970s Les Paul Custom.

I may not be alone in this view, but I’m confident that one of the reasons that these Burny and Fernandes artist or endorser models are so accurate would have been because so many of these musicians traveled to and performed in Japan throughout the 70s and 80s, and technicians would have had first-hand access to the originals to gather specs.
I did read that Randy's actual guitar was studied in detail by Fernandes to make the guitar accurate. I doubt his guitar had such an odd radius.
 
Back
Top