Tokai Forum - a subsidiary of TokaiRegistry.com Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Gibson/PRS lawsuit

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Tokai Forum - a subsidiary of TokaiRegistry.com Forum Index -> Guitars
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kherman
Guitar God


Joined: 29 Jul 2003
Posts: 82
Location: Milwaukee, Wi. USA

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 7:13 am    Post subject: Gibson/PRS lawsuit Reply with quote

NASHVILLE, March 12 (UPI) -- Gibson Guitar has won a U.S. trademark infringement case against manufacturer Paul Reed Smith for copying Gibson's Les Paul single cutaway model guitar.

A federal court judge in Nashville Thursday agreed with Gibson's complaint that Paul Reed Smith had violated U.S. patent and trademark laws by making the copycat guitars without permission from or compensation to Gibson. Gibson, which trademarked the Les Paul distinct body style in 1987, claimed in its lawsuit that Paul Reed Smith had been making guitars, called the "PRS Singlecut" with the same Les Paul design since 2000 to capitalize on the original Les Paul's popularity.

The century-old instrument manufacturer began making the Les Paul electric guitar, named for the veteran guitar player, in 1952. The style remains one of Gibson's most popular instruments.

Monetary restitution to Gibson will be decided at a hearing in 90 days.


This has been going around the guitar sites lately.
Don't know how true it is. But, it does bring up some interesting thoughts.
Basically should Gibson be given the right to trademark the basic singlecut body design. Not just the LP cut. But, anything even remotely similar. So, other companies would have to pay licensing fees to Gibson.
Examples: Dean EVO, Tokai NLS, ESP Eclipse, Guild Bluesbird, Carvin SC90, Heritage H150, Hamer Monaco, PRS Singlecut, etc...
None of these are exact LP body shape replicas. They all have altered designs. But, Gibson still feels they should be reimburst because they somewhat resemble a LP. Basically the generic singlecut design.

Fender by the way has applied for a trademark as well for the offset double cutaway design. Meaning PRS would again be infringing on the Strat design with the 24 custom. Same with others like ESP, Fernandes, Ibanez, Etc...

Your thoughts?
Does Gibson and Fender have the right?
Or are they infringing on other companies rights to be competitive?

Kent
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ned
Guitar God


Joined: 29 Aug 2001
Posts: 1154
Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2004 7:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Got more details including a picture of the PRS in question:

http://www.tokairegistry.com/industry_news.html


Ned
_________________
Tokai Guitar Info
Grail Tone
EVH Guitar Info
Porsche 911 Racing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Tokai Forum - a subsidiary of TokaiRegistry.com Forum Index -> Guitars All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group