JohnA
Well-known member
Not totaly sure, NOS russian made paper in oil caps, they sound fine to me! Got a few more if you want them :wink:
Diodibuh said:tnx John, I think it's better idea to change pots instead of drilling holes
JohnA said:I really wouldn't use 250K pots for humbuckers.
Not sure if you would need long or short shaft for an Edwards, I would guess short but could be worng. I would take one out and check first, no need to un-wire it, just losen the nut.
What's wrong with the standard pots? I would think they would be high-quality ones, so you would get no benefit from changing them.
Emiel said:... but then I heard of replacing the 500k pots by 300k or even 250k. A lot of Gibsons these days seem to use 300k volume pots... so that's got me thinking.
Mick51 said:Too bright sounding... What are your cap values? Before I changed pots, I would put in a larger cap value and see what that does as you dial down the tone; that should let you roll off more of the highs, down into the upper mids. Try 0.047 microfarads or so for value.
tudor said:Emiel said:... but then I heard of replacing the 500k pots by 300k or even 250k. A lot of Gibsons these days seem to use 300k volume pots... so that's got me thinking.
I can confirm that ... there are alot of guys out there who say that they'd never put 500k pots at the bridge position ...
I did it as well with 300k Gibson pots on my Classic and there's a noticable difference ...
BTW - we're talking about the bridge tone pot only ... the vol pots are still 500ks and so is the neck pup tone pot ...
Roger
Emiel said:RS guitarworks' treble tamer kit features 300k volume pots for instance... and Poorman in this thread used those as well... my "whole" Edwards guitar is a tad bright, so wouldn't it be better to swap both the volume pots (as I will have a push/pull pot on the neck tone pot)
Enter your email address to join: