Tokai Forum - a subsidiary of TokaiRegistry.com Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Matching body/neck codes misinformation?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Tokai Forum - a subsidiary of TokaiRegistry.com Forum Index -> Vintage (Older than 1985)
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Do body/neck codes have to match?
Yep, to be all original
5%
 5%  [ 1 ]
By no means
55%
 55%  [ 11 ]
Don?t know
25%
 25%  [ 5 ]
Don't care
15%
 15%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 20

Author Message
Reborn Old
Guitar God


Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 481

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jacco wrote:

On the other hand, another fellow forum member and logger Reborn Old, did say earlier this year that after a few years of logging he never had seen a code with a number higher than 15 as second digit and therefore didn't think it was a date code.


To be clear, I've been logging serial numbers only.
My stamp # observation one month ago, was from a quick sample of pics on hand at that moment.
I did obviously find higher numbers shortly afterwards, but my only point was that most numbers from the small sample had low second numbers.


Last edited by Reborn Old on Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:42 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Russian Vadim
Guitar God


Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Posts: 90

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

More pics of the supposedly '78 partsocaster








Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Peter Mac
Guitar God


Joined: 16 Dec 2001
Posts: 1060
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Vadim,

This is by no means an effort to offend you or your friend - just a statement of observations borne of knowledge.

Body : truth be told I am a little shocked. The body looks genuine 1978. All the hallmarks are there for a high-end body, possibly ST-80. The neck pocket grain is ash and the control cavity has no shoulder [required for 11-screw pickguard] Ash is quite porous and tends to soak up the finish, leaving it irregular and not smooth, hence the introduction of alder. The shot of the front pickup cavity clearly shows the finish absorbtion by the grain - alder would not be so violent.

By 1979 all ST and SS bodies, ash or alder, had the cavity shoulder.

My conclusion would still be Partsocaster : St-80 body+electrics with St-50 neck
regards
Peter Mac

PS : Love the socks
_________________
The world will not end today...because it is already tomorrow in Australia.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
felixcatus
Guitar God


Joined: 03 Nov 2010
Posts: 1175
Location: Antwerp, Belgium

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another anomaly, two different codes on the same body.

neckpup cavity '11=1'
control cavity '1=7BL A Z'
neck end/heel '2=13A'
and seems like there's 'V' written to the neck pocket

the guitar is:

7okai "Breezysound" TE-80 #01xx
Ash body / Butterscotch blonde
V-profile maple neck,
Deluxe stamped tuners,
FINAL Pro.Spec. stamped vintage bridge / Brass saddles
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jacco
Guitar God


Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 2871
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are so many.

1981 ST-50
SN 102xxxx
neck: 7 = 4
body: 8 = 5 MR X
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
felixcatus
Guitar God


Joined: 03 Nov 2010
Posts: 1175
Location: Antwerp, Belgium

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jacco wrote:
There are so many.

1981 ST-50
SN 102xxxx
neck: 7 = 4
body: 8 = 5 MR X


I?m a little confused here, what do you mean by neck, the neck heel, neck pickup cavity or neck pocket?

I refer to the body code only, not the neck heel/body codes.
Only 1 body code in your example, my example has 2 different body codes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jacco
Guitar God


Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 2871
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Neck = neck code to me, otherwise I would say neck pickup cavity code.
Just another contribution to the mismatch pool.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
felixcatus
Guitar God


Joined: 03 Nov 2010
Posts: 1175
Location: Antwerp, Belgium

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jacco wrote:
Neck = neck code to me, otherwise I would say neck pickup cavity code.
Same here.

felixcatus wrote:

I?m a little confused here, what do you mean by neck, the neck heel, neck pickup cavity or neck pocket?
I asked because your example contains only 2 code series. And I thought you were referring to the example in my previous post, the 2 series of codes on one and the same body.
jacco wrote:
There are so many.

1981 ST-50
SN 102xxxx
neck: 7 = 4
body: 8 = 5 MR X
.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jacco
Guitar God


Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 2871
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another contriibution to the no day code & stamp in middel pup cavity;





1978 ST-50
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
hunter
Guitar God


Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 437
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The ST50N above is my guitar and I have a few questions......
The neck appears original per the codes but there is also the tooling marks in the neck cavity.I have inspected them and there is no evidence of being plugged.If someone were to drill and plug I would think the plug would be flush and not recessed. Also the serial number is pre 8002xxx and is stamped into the cover which I believe Peter said shouldn't be.The 50 stamp is also missing from the last fret??






Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jacco
Guitar God


Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 2871
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Model type stamp on body = no fretboard stamp. That is normal for 1978.
Normal neck plate = serial number etched on neck plate, small neck plate = serial number stamped on neck. So that's also normal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
hunter
Guitar God


Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 437
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Jacco...I misunderstood what peter was saying
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jacco
Guitar God


Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 2871
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What Peter meant was that up to about 8002000 there's a mix of both small and normal neck plates. After that only the normal neck plate variety.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jacco
Guitar God


Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 2871
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 5:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's an interesting quote from Gottfried (Tokaiguitar.de) on nov 13 2006 on Japanaxe forum:


"any explanations/info with regarding those cavity markings?


These are production schedules: 4 = 3 for example means: The third bulk/ charge of guitars in the month April. In the past I was meaning that would be matching codes. To match and fit the correct neck ino the neck pocket of the body. I met one month ago the president of Tokai. I told him my meaning. He was loughing and said: "Oh no, instead of Fender ... our tool machines were working very correct in the eighties. There were no need to use match codes"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Suki
Guitar God


Joined: 22 Feb 2013
Posts: 319
Location: London, United Kingdom

PostPosted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So this is very interesting info - the codes appear to have a purpose, and in most cases they would match, but because the quality was so consistent, it was not necessary to match codes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Tokai Forum - a subsidiary of TokaiRegistry.com Forum Index -> Vintage (Older than 1985) All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 5 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group